tech

On The iPhone

The Apple Phone is an astounding technological marvel. Where Microsoft set up a whole new OS product line for years, at great cost, to bring the Windows experience to mobile users, Steve, in standard Steve fashion, just waited until the hardware caught up to be able to leverage his current software assets. It's his style. Just like when he was leading NeXT: they were one of the last workstation makers to stay exclusively Black & White, waiting until they could offer color without all the compromises like color mapping X11 required.

Cingular, I am totally guessing and speaking on my own behalf, is subsidizing this for around 200 dollars. Which means that this device's real market price is around 800 to 900 dollars. For that price he is in the same ballpark as the Microsoft-powered big smartphones like the high-end GPS enabled HTCs and iPaqs. He has blown them out of the water with their interface, though. It looks amazing and will be a joy to use just for the eyecandy.

However, he is taking two big risks in that UI. One is text entry. Soft keyboards are not as well liked as thumbboards. No, I cannot point to a reference for that. Just trust me on it: people would rather use their two thumbs to enter text that having to use their pointing finger while holding the device in the other hand. Mac OS X does have handwriting recognition built in, it is called Inkwell, so maybe that will be a text-entry modality that will make this more pleasant for a minority of users.

The second big risk is the touch screen itself. You can't dial this thing blind. You can't feel your way around the keys. Touch feedback is always a concern for users when they use keypads. Yes, the controls can be totally flexible when you have no defined hardware buttons, but without the spring of the key back to your finger, users feel lost, insecure, unhappy. This has been reported since the Timex Sinclair ZX81 became a global hit in home hobby computers in the early eighties. I truly hope Apple got the engineering right on this touch screen to make it a joy to use. I do not see it. It still am not entirely happy using pinkfish's click wheel on his iPod.

Then there's the next little issue nobody noticed yet, well, except for the guys at Gizmodo: its size. Yeah, that hand model they are using for the promo shots of the Apple phone? <insert big hands / big wrists joke here>. This thing is marginally more pocketable than a Newton was, and that was one of the big minusses against the Newton.dpnash did some fact checking and found out that Apple lists a different size for it than Gizmodo does. This new size is far more viable as a pocketable device. Still on the big size, but not ridiculously so. No longer in MessagePad territory.

ranger1 just pointed out to me that, four, this thing may just be terribly fragile. Mobile devices like phones have to be engineered to withstand actual life. That people throw their phones arouns is a fact, whether people mean to do so or not. Nokia phones, for example, can take drops that would destroy most other equipment. Even the hard-disk N91 can be dropped from heights on floors that would make iPods cry anguished tears.

I can tell you all one thing, though: the mobile Researchers, Product Managers, designers, and all other staff involved in the high-end Nokia N and E series lines are right now in need of a stiff stif stiff drink. Maybe two. Same for the Walkman people at Sony-Ericsson. Because whether the Apple Phone is a success despite its size and interface or not -- both issues did hamper the also insanely marketed Sony PSP after all -- the whole set of expectations people will have for a high-end mobile media phone device just changed. Offering the N93 feature set for 800 Euros simply will not do anymore. Over. Go make something hugely better. In fact, stop dicking around and just rush this into production now.
Tags: , ,

Comments

The fragility factor is a major obstacle, though more so for the mainstream than the early adopters. If they can make the entire thing pink and sparkly, they can get the Paris Hilton endorsement to fix that.

As for texting, you're right, I virtually touch type when thumbing the keypad, and the lack of that sensation, and having to use either my index finger or a stencil would drive me nuts, I can use both thumbs on my cell phone or Blackberry, and type faster.

I remember when they tried to "silence" keyboards on PCs (migrating from the louder typewriters and their tactile feedback must have been hard enough) and how people felt no bounce back on their keys, so they had to adjust for that, even making some keyboards "click" until people got used to the lack of the "click". Maybe it's something we will get used to, in time?

I will say: nice move on GSM quad band. It's very stimulating visually, no doubt that will calm a lot of nerves about the other features.
People bring in pulverized nano screens on a daily basis, and that's less than a square inch of glass in a rigid chassis. They then directly and shamelessly accuse you of making defective screens. Every yuppie tool child is going to have one of these by the start of the 2007-2008 school year , and a majority will break them within weeks. I do not fathom the psychology behind this because I remember bursting into tears the first time I saw a neighbor accidentally drop his Nintendo down a flight of stairs. But whatever. Maybe technology has almost lost its ability to retain magic.

Even if the details are horribly botched and this is the grandest failure Apple ever makes, it's going to improve regular phones just like you said. And the flash demos on apple.com are sex incarnate. SQUEEE! Best presentation ever.
The animated demos of the keyboard interface on apple.com suggest that you can in fact two-thumb the softboard, but I'm with you on worrying about the lack of tactile feedback.

My other worries:

1. EDGE? Seriously, just EDGE? No HSPDA? On a $600 phone?

2. How does that screen NOT become One Big Smudge after a few minutes of use? Also: is it any less scratch-prone than the Nano?

3. It runs "OSX"? Okay: can I pop up terminal.app and ssh somewhere? Can I load 3rd-party applications, or is this a sidekick-like Bondage & Discipline experience where Cingular gets to decide what apps I run?

4. Conspicuously missing from the ipod demonstration: "Use this song as ringtone." C'mon here...
I, too, want to know more about just what was meant by "run[ing] OSX." I do love FJ's point about the NeXT-like behavior of waiting for the hardware and other technologies to catch up, rather than developing an entirely different (and, in the case of "WinCE" garbage), crippled OS.
I agree with your critique, particularly with regard with touch-screen/soft keyboard input and form factor/size. I had the same reaction, in terms of the latter, when I saw the shot of the model's hand vis-a-vis the iPhone (try to get me to stop calling it that). My best reaction to this is that people will keep the unit sleeved or stored whenever possible while using it as a phone (I already endeavor to do this with my bluetooth dorkset + Sony Ericsson phone), and will appreciate the size and relative large screen that goes along with it when using the device for media.

That having been said, it is obviously designed, first and foremost as a phone, as the baby sized fixed storage increments won't even touch most people's music collections (I currently tote around a 60 GB iPod these days).

Naturally, it's going to be next phone...but hopefully in its G2 incarnation. ;o)
(Erm, "It's going to be my next phone...")
You are correct about the keyboard & size. I do like my E62 -- the keyboard is mostly usable (I occasionally mistype). The size of the E62 is a bit big but with that comes outstanding talk time/idle time.

My biggest criticism of the E62? Symbian is SLOW. Painfully sometimes.

The iPhone is cool but not at that price. We got the E62s for just $150 each. Can't beat that.
I can't tell you how much of a crime I find the existance of the E62. It is so crippled comapred to the E60 WiFi enabled version. I know of at least one Nordic hardcore software geeks who no longer packs his laptop when he travels now that he has an E60 to keep him in touch wherever there's a hotspot.

Still, I bet that it di allow dropping the price of the device until US operators saw there would be a market for it. It's screen is delicious. I always wished I could get a combo E60/N73.

And Symbian v3.0 is a dog. I also think Symbian is a dead end.

Two Name Questions

Name Question #1: "iPhone"? Did they work out a deal with Linksys/Cisco under the table (or at least off the radar) before this? Or are they prepared to duke it out in court with one of the few companies willing to take them to the mat?

Name Question #2: "Apple, Inc."? In lieu of "Apple Computer, Inc."? Does this mean that Apple is acknowledging that they're not a computer company?

Re: Two Name Questions

To answer the latter:

Yes, and that is why this move is such huge news. Steve even noted that it's "not about the Macintosh" anymore.

AAPL is up about 8%, by the way (and RIM has taken a dip).

Re: Two Name Questions

I'm assuming that the name change means that they've finally hammered out some permanent agreement with Apple Music -- Steve playing the Beatles on the iPhone during the keynote also suggsted this.

Re: Two Name Questions

At least with 2, I'd say the answer is yes. No clue about a Cisco deal.

Oh, and one more thing...

...can we expect some drastic GUI improvements to match the OS and interface on the iPhone on the old iPod line? Are standalone iPods going to go the way of the dodo?

My iPod's been looking downright dowdy for awhile now, and although I'd never admit it mixed company, the Zune (in all its poop-brown glory) that I saw over the winter break had a lot going for it in these terms over my year-old iPod (fourth one I've owned).

Re: Oh, and one more thing...

re: Zune

You'd think that, until you started trying to use it. It's dreadful. I have a 4th gen B&W clickwheel iPod, and I'd take it over the Zune, just for the interface.
I believe the new iPhone surface is actually radio transparant zircon, so it should have the hardness of a diamond (ish). This should keep it scratch and impact resistant.

multitouch is AMAZING. I am so glad they were able to make that happen. Virtual-only keyboards suck. you're 100% right on the money with that one. I think Apple's stance on it is "when was the last time you actually *dialed* a number?" And I think they have a point.... until you get to SMS and ichat. Then that argument breaks down. I have big hands. That thing is small. Even with all the corrective software in the universe, I *will* mis-click. Probably often. That simply doesn't happen with a real keyboard.

Oddly, the interface reminds me of the Newton.
fj I wonder how the Newton fanboys are feeling
10:35 ranger1 two words: slow burn.
Then there's the next little issue nobody noticed yet, well, except for the guys at Gizmodo: its size.

That link has the wrong dimensions for the iPhone. Apple says it's 4.5 x 2.4 x 0.46 inches, which is almost the same as the Treo dimensions on the Gizmodo link.
Thanks for catching that. That does make the device more viable.

Tactile feel

I always keep a spare of those old IBM PC keyboards that still feel and sound a bit Selectric ... so I have parts for the one I use to type.

And damn it I'm just going to keep telling myself that I love my new Walkman Phone (W810i). It's keys thumb great. And I just won't even look at that interface - so I won't know what I'm missing.
Soft keyboards suck, but I am not convinced that they suck all that much worse than thumbboards. I have gotten used to two-thumbing my LG VX 9800, but it's really not what I would call convenient.

And: I'm really not convinced that a soft keyboard sucks worse than T9 or the like, for entering alpha text on a numeric keypad. Given the interfaces that SMS fans have gotten accustomed to, it's not clear to me how much of a drawback this will turn out to be.

I do suspect that Apple is counting on Inkwell to make the soft keyboard irrelevant for at least some of their users.

A very interesting point about the lack of tactile feedback. I'm not sure I believe the specific examples -- blind dialing? theoctothorpe already said what I would say about that. :-) But I do believe you that it is a big psychological barrier for the user.

I'm totally creaming myself over this thing, honestly. I can't wait for my VZW contract to run out so I can switch to Cingular.
As a 21st-century MessagePad owner I knew once put it, to someone using a Palm or something: “You're just mad because yours is smaller than mine.”

Mobile devices like phones have to be engineered to withstand actual life.

Once upon a time I saw someone on the A train who seemed to be trying to issue the standard iPod reset sequence. However, he didn't seem to have gotten it quite right, and apparently the iPod agreed with my assessment, because he then took to whacking the device against the seat and flicking his finger against it, repeatedly, as if that would somehow help.
[waves] Added you to my flist, solely for your insightful tech commentary. No, really...!
I don't do much of it, though. Being employed in a mobile phone company I have to be very careful about it.
The second big risk is the touch screen itself.

I give you even odds on Apple being the first company to market a touch screen with tactile feedback. I've been thinking about it a lot since they announced the phone. Given you know where the fingers are, you can get away with a really low resolution for the tactile display...

(Anonymous)

Please help with avatar!

Yo all

How I can change avatar in this forum?